Socio-Ecological Foundation of Marketable Surplus Generation in Agriculture: The Complexity and Compliances

Main Article Content

Debraj Roy
S. K. Achaya
Arindam Ghosh
Debashis Mazumder
Swagata Ghoshal
Monirul Haque
Amitava Biswas

Abstract

The study was conducted on Rice and Poultry entrepreneurs in Memari-1 block, Purba Barddhaman district of West Bengal, India. This has been conducted to assess their socio-personal, agro-economical and techno-managerial skills. Several entrepreneurial aspects are considered in this study to portrait a well discernible picture of their entrepreneurship. The acquired data and other information was critically examined with several statistical tools like range, mean, standard deviation, variance, correlation coefficient, stepwise regression analysis, multiple regression analysis, factor analysis and cluster analysis. Total 18 variables were considered for the study in which 15 of them are independent variables and 3 of them dependent variables. Correlation coefficient is significant for the independent variables in case of one dependent variable i.e. produce marketed (y3). After performing Stepwise Regression analysis several satisfactory conclusions were drawn for the study which well described the current neo agricultural scenario in rural Bengal. It has been recorded that when the economic land is more, then the marketed surplus becomes lower as because small holdings entrepreneurs concentrate more in the production phase. Marketed surplus has a positive relationship with the Education level. It has been recorded that Marketed surplus has a positive relationship with electricity consumption also. Having a higher marketed surplus indicate more advancement and betterment in terms of entrepreneurial management and thus fuel use efficiency becomes more prominent and fuel consumption is reduced. It has been recorded that when the innovation proneness and market interaction is higher for the respondents, the marketed surplus is also higher.

Keywords:
Agro-economical, challenges, poultry, rice, socio-personal, techno-managerial characters.

Article Details

How to Cite
Roy, D., Achaya, S. K., Ghosh, A., Mazumder, D., Ghoshal, S., Haque, M., & Biswas, A. (2020). Socio-Ecological Foundation of Marketable Surplus Generation in Agriculture: The Complexity and Compliances. Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, 26(9), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.9734/jemt/2020/v26i930286
Section
Original Research Article

References

Getnet K, Anullo T. Agricultural cooperatives and rural livelihoods: Evidence from Ethiopia. Annals of public and cooperative Economics. 2012;8(2): 181-18.

Anantha KH, Wani SP, Sreedevi TK. Agricultural and allied micro-enterprise for livelihood opportunities. International Crop research institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT); 2009.

Islam MDS, Begum IA, Kausar AKMG, Hossain R. Livelihood improvement of small farmers through family poultry in Bangladesh. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Research. 2015;1(2):61-70. DOI- 10.18801/ijiomsr.010215.07.

Gueye EF. Employment and income generation through family poultry in low income food deficit countries. World Poultry Science Journal. 2002;58(4):541-557. DOI-10.1079/WPS20020039.

Baliyan SP, Masuku MB. Socio-Economic factors as determinants of farm management skills among broiler poultry producers in Botswana. International Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2017; 2(2):27-34. DOI:10.11648/j.ijae.20170202.11.

Mohanty, Samarendu, Rajendran K. 2020 vision for indian poultry industry. International journal of Poultry Science. 2003;2(2):139-143.

Adebayo OO, Adeola RG. Socio-economic factors affecting Poultry farmers in Ejigbo local government area of Osun state. Journal of Human Ecology. 2017;18(1):39-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2005.11905804

Mustaman H, Sukiyono K., Nusril. Rice marketable surplus, Marketed supply and its determinant factors In Mukomuko District. Journal of Agri Socio-Economic and Business. 2019;1(1):1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31186/jaseb.1.1.1-14.

Devi KS, Ponnarasi T. An economic analysis of modern rice production technology and its adoption behaviour in Tamil Nadu. Agricultural Economics Research Review. 2009;22.

Musaba EC, Mukwalikuli M. Soico-Economic factors affecting rice production among small holders farmers in Lukulu District, Western Zambia. International Journal of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences. 2019;5(11):35-40. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/12.20431/2454-6224.0511005.

Ayoola JB, Dangbegnon C, Daudu CK, Mando A, Kudi TM, Amapu IY, Adeosun JO, Ezui KS. Socio-Economic factors influencing rice production among male and female farmers in Northern Guinea Savanna Nigeria: Lesson for promoting gender equity in action Research. Agriculture and Biology journal of North America; 2011. DOI-10.5251/abjna.2011.2.6.1010.1014

Hafez HM, Attia YA. Challenges to the poultry industry: Current perspectives and strategic future after the COVID-19 outbreak. Frontiers in Veterinary Science; 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00516

Moreki JC. Opportunities and Challenges for the Botswana poultry industry in the 21st Century: A review. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 2010;22(5)

Tsujimoto Y, Rakotoson T, Tanaka A, Saito K. Challenges and opportunities for improving N use efficiency for rice production in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal Plant Production Science. 2019;22(4): 413-427. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2019.1617638.

Nguyen NV, Ferrero A. Meeting the challenges of global rice production. Paddy and Water Environment. 2006;4:1-9.