Distribution of Income (Including Minimum Wage); Comparison of Societies as Studied by a Molecular-Dynamics Algorithm and Analytical Techniques

Main Article Content

Peter Stallinga

Abstract

In this research we tried to answer the question: How to optimize the total production of economy. For finding the answer we used two postulates: First, a worker is incentivated to work if it pays off. When in the income ranking the neighbor below earns less and the one above earns more the worker will work harder and produce more. The productivity of the worker is proportional to this ’derivative’ in the income curve. (Note: a worker’s salary is not assumed necessarily proportional to his productivity). The second postulate depends on who is in control of the production process. In highly-simplified naming: In capitalism, the capital takes the decisions, in a democracy the people do, by vote. We also simulated a dictatorial system in which decisions can be imposed
by a (benevolent) dictator.


We used these ingredients in evolutionary computation. Starting with an arbitrary initial distribution, we make random small changes to it and if the total production increases, a decision will be made whether to implement these changes. This procedure is repeated until the distribution is stable. Remarkably, the outcomes for ’democracy’ and ’capitalism’ are similar. Capitalism and democracy go hand-in-hand together: One person getting all income, two people working, and most not working and not receiving. These results are also analytically found.

In ’communism’, nobody works and everybody perishes. In a ’dictatorial’ system we can optimize production for the benefit of the people, and come to the conclusion that the introduction of minimum wages is beneficial, and these should be 50% of the average income.

Keywords:
Income distribution, Minimum wage, Molecular dynamics simulation, Macro-economy.

Article Details

How to Cite
Stallinga, P. (2019). Distribution of Income (Including Minimum Wage); Comparison of Societies as Studied by a Molecular-Dynamics Algorithm and Analytical Techniques. Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, 25(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.9734/jemt/2019/v25i230191
Section
Original Research Article

References

Claudia Seni. Wealth and happiness. In: Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2014;30:92108. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/gru004

Chris Tofallis. Which formula for national happiness?. In: Socio-Economic Planning Sciences; 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2019.02.003

Probe. (visited on 02/28/2019 Available: https://probe.org/utilitarianism-the-greatest-good-for-the-greatest-numbe

OECD. Measuring Capital OECD Manual, 2nd edition. In: 2009. Available: https://unstats.un.org/

OECD. OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. OECD Publishing; 2013. ISBN: 978-92-64-19164-8 DOI: 10.1787/9789264191655-en

Cassie Mogilner. Its time for happiness. In: Current Opinion in Psychology. 2019;26:8084. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.07.002

Tribe K. Political economy, history of. In: Political Economy, History of. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2001;1164911653. DOI: 10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/00082-6.

Ivan T Berend. Capitalism. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2015;3:9498. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.62003-2

Jurgen Kocka. Capitalism: The history of the concept. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2015;3:105110. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.03069-5

Thomas Piketty. Capital in the 21st century. Editions du Seuil, Harvard University Press, 2014. ISBN: 978-0674430006

Karl Marx. Critique of the gotha program. German: Kritik des Gothaer Programms; 1875.

Gabriel Temkin. Karl marx and the economics of communism: Anniversary recollections. In: Communist and Post-Communist Studies 1998;31:303328.

David Ellerman. Marxism as a capitalist tool. In: The Journal of Socio- Economics. 2010;39:696700. DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2010.06.008

Free pascal. Free Pascal. (visited on 09/18/2019) Available: https://www.freepascal.org/

Lazarus. Lazarus.(visited on 09/18/2019) Available: https://www.lazarus-ide.org/

Linux Mint. Linux Mint. (visited on 09/18/2019) Available: https://linuxmint.com/

Wikipedia. Encapsulated Postscript. (visited on 09/18/2019). Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/-Encapsulated-Post

Wikipedia. (visited on 09/18/2019). Available: https://www.latex-project.org/

Ferdinand Lassalle. Iron law of wages; 2004. Available:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron-law-of-(visited on 04/30/2019)

Frederic L. Pryor. Capitalism and freedom?. In: Economic Systems. 2010;34:91104. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2009.09.003

Karl Marx. The Communist Manifesto; 2015. ISBN: 978-1508475668

Joowon Jeonga, Hakyeon Lee. Public attitudes toward the minimum wage debate: Effects of partisanship, ideology, beliefs. In: The Social Science Journal; 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2019.03.011

Radek Sauer. The macroeconomics of the minimum wage. In: Journal of Macroeconomics. 2018;56:89112. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2018.01.003

Hiroko C, Miho Takizawa, Kenta Yamanouchi. Minimum wage effects across heterogeneousmarkets. In: Journal of Macroeconomics; 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2019.03.004

OECD. Minimumwages relative to median wages; 2013. DOI: 10.1787/data-00313-en Available: https://www.oecdilibrary.org/conte-nt/data/data-00313-en

Wikipedia. Efficient-market hypothesis. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effi-cient-market(visited on 04/24/2019)

WuyiWang, Peter C, Phillips B, Liangjun Su.The heterogeneous effects of the minimum wage on employment across states. In: Economics Letters. 2019;174:179185. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.11.002

Tim Krieger, Daniel Meierrieks. Political capitalism: The interaction between income inequality, economic freedom and democracy. In: European Journal of Political Economy. 2016;45:115132. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.10.005

Nassim Nicholas Taleb. Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder. New York: Random House; 2012.ISBN: 978-1-4000-6782-4