Main Article Content
The advancement of internet technologies and the emergence of social media platforms have made the influence of electronic word of mouth (eWOM) more pronounced than ever before on consumers’ purchase decisions, especially young consumers who are more engaged with new technologies and social networks. Through social media platforms, young consumers nowadays are always connected to friends, families and organizations on smartphones, tablets or computers and actively look for eWOM before making purchase decisions. This study is aimed at examining the effect of perceived eWOM on the university enrolment intentions by the Saudi high school students mediated by the corporate image of the university. The sample comprised of 133 high school students studying in Saudi high secondary schools. The findings revealed that electronic word of mouth (eWOM) had a significant and positive association with the students’ enrolment intentions, and the corporate image mediates this relationship. This research’s findings and recommendations can largely help who are in charge of the private and public universities in Saudi Arabia to understand how eWOM shapes the university choices of students.
Lee KY, Choi H. Predictors of electronic word-of-mouth behavior on social networking sites in the United States and Korea: Cultural and social relationship variables. Computers in Human Behavior. 2019;94:9-18.
Allsop DT, Bassett BR, Hoskins JA. Word-of-mouth research: Principles and applications. Journal of Advertising Research. 2007;47(4):398-411.
Hennig-Thurau T, Gwinner KP, Walsh G, Gremler DD. Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing. 2004;18(1):38-52.
Chu S, Choi SM. Electronic word-of-mouth in social networking sites: A cross-cultural study of the United States and China. Journal of Global Marketing. 2011;24:263-281.
Andreassen TW, Streukens S. Service innovation and electronic word-of mouth: Is it worth listening to? Managing Service Quality. 2009;19(3):249-269.
Cheung CMK, Lee MKO. What drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth in online consumer-opinion platforms. Decision Support Systems. 2012;53:218-225.
Towers A, Towers N. Re-evaluating the postgraduate students’ course selection decision making process in the digital era. Studies in Higher Education. 2018;1-16.
Jalilvand RM, Samiei N. The effect of electronic word of mouth on brand image and purchase intention: An empirical study in the automobile industry in Iran. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 2012; 30(4):460-476.
Torlak O, Ozkara BY, Tiltay MA, Cengiz H, Dulger MF. The effect of electronic word of mouth on brand image and purchase intention: An application concerning cell phone brands for youth consumers in Turkey. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness. 2014;8(2):61-68.
Nam K, Baker J, Ahmad N, Goo J. Dissatisfaction, disconfirmation, and distrust: An empirical examination of value co-destruction through negative electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM). Information Systems Frontiers. 2018;1-18.
Sparks BA, Browning V. The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trust. Tourism Management. 2011;32(6):1310–1323.
Mauri AG, Minazzi R. Web reviews influence on expectations and purchasing intentions of hotel potential customers. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2013;34:99-107.
Zhu F, Zhang X. Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing. 2010; 74(2):133-148.
Steffes EM, Burgee LE. Social ties and online word of mouth. Internet Research. 2009;19(1):42-59.
Hartman KB, Hunt JB. What rate my professors com reveals about how and why students evaluate their professors: A glimpse into the student mind-set. Marketing Education Review. 2013;23(2): 151-162.
General Authority for Statistics. Demography Survey. Saudi Arabia; 2016.
Radcliffe D, Bruni P. State of social media, Middle East: 2018; 2019.
Kotler Philip, Lane Keller, Kevin, Hassan, Salah, Baalbaki, Imad, Shamma, Hamed. Marketing Management (Arab World Edition); 2012.
Hossler D, Gallagher K. Studying student college choice: A three-phase model and the implications for policymakers. College and University. 1987;62(3):207-221.
Yang HP, Mutum DS. Electronic word-of-mouth for university selection: Implications for academic leaders and recruitment managers. Journal of General Manage-ment. 2015;40(4):23-44.
Lehmann WS. The influence of electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) on college search and choice; 2015.
Spears N, Singh S. Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising. 2004;26(2):53-66.
Chen Q, Clifford SJ, Wells WD. Attitude toward the site II: New information. Journal of Advertising Research. 2002;42(2):33-45.
Dehghani M, Niaki MK, Ramezani I, Sali R. Evaluating the influence of You Tube advertising for attraction of young customers. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;59:165-172.
Dehghani M, Tumer M. A research on effectiveness of Facebook advertising on enhancing purchase intention of consumer. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015;49:597-600.
Bataineh AQ. The impact of perceived e-WOM on purchase intention: The mediating role of corporate image. Inter-national Journal of Marketing Studies. 2015;7(1):126.
Greenacre L, Freeman L, Cong K, Chapman T. Understanding and predicting student word of mouth. International Journal of Educational Research. 2014;64:40-48.
Prendergast G, Ko D, Yuen SYV. Online word of mouth and consumer purchase intentions. International Journal of Advertising. 2010;29(5).
Park DH, Lee J, Han I. The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 2007;11(4):125-148.
Ladhari R, Michaud M. eWOM effects on hotel booking intentions, attitudes, trust, and website perceptions. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2015;46:36-45.
Kudeshia C, Kumar A. Social eWOM: Does it affect the brand attitude and purchase intention of brands? Manage-ment Research Review. 2017;40(3):310-330.
Reichelt Jonas, Jens Sievert, Frank Jacob. How credibility affects eWOM reading: The influences of expertise, trustworthiness, and similarity on utilitarian and social functions. Journal of Marketing Communi-cations. 2014;20(1–2):65–81.
Fogg BJ, Kameda T, Boyd J, Marshall J, Sethi R, Sockol M, Trowbridge T. Stanford Makovsky web credibility study 2002: Investigating what makes web sites credible today. A Research Report by the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab & Makovsky & Company, Stanford University; 2002.
Xu Q. Should I trust him? The effects of reviewer profile characteristics on eWOM credibility. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014;33:136e144.
Xie H, Miao L, Kuo PJ, Lee BY. Consumers’ responses to ambivalent online hotel reviews: The role of perceived source credibility and pre-decisional disposition. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2011;30(1):178–183.
Valenzuela S, Park N, Kee KF. Is there social capital in a social network site: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation? Journal of Computer-mediated Communi-cation. 2009;14(4):875-901.
Cheung EA. The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Research. 2008;18(3):229-247.
Park DH, Lee J. eWOM overload and its effect on customer behavioral intention depending on customer involvement. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 2008;7(4):386.
Sher PJ, Lee SH. Customer skepticism and online reviews: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Social Behavior and Personality. 2009;37(1):137-144.
Gray G. Interaction of learner control and prior understanding in computer-assisted video instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1986;78(3):225.
Avram EM. The relationship between the university image and students' willingness to recommend it. Cross-Cultural Management Journal. 2016;18(2): 115-123.
Damayanti, Surbriadi AP. Electronic word of mouth (E-WOM): A Pathto Buildthe Imageof University. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology. 2016; 94(1)123-132.
Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39:32-36.
Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unob-servable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981; 18(1):39-50.
DeVellis RF. Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2003.
Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guildford; 2005.
John OP, Benet-Martinez V. Measurement: Reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psycho-logy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51(6):1173.